It
was a bit harder for me to decipher the deeper meaning of Adrienne Rich’s poem,
“Diving into the Wreck”. On the surface, it appears to be about a woman’s
exploration of a long lost ship wreck, however, talking in class and reading a little
deeper, I feel that it is truly a thought provoking poem wherein Rich is really
taking a feminist stance in regards to inequality of the sexes, and as a direct
result the “wreck” that’s become society.
Being
that Rich’s poem was written in the early 1970s, I feel that it makes it more
clear that Rich was writing about and touching on society before the second
wave feminist movement. As Rich writes, “I came to see the wreck...I came to see the damage that was done
and the treasures that prevail” (Rich, 1987). In our patriarchal society where
men are viewed as the standard, and hold more power and inherent privileges,
women are often negatively affected by the values and ideas patriarchy
instills. This was certainly the case before both feminist wave movements,
where women truly had less equality and a hard time achieving it. In this case
I think Rich is “exploring” the effects of oppression and limitations faced by
women at the hands of the patriarchal nature of society. For as the effects of
assumptions, expectations, and ideas of/for women have effected them, they have
been held to live up to these different aspects. However, as damaging as it may
be there were signs of progress and change (i.e. women’s right to vote), things that showed promise of change and hope for women,
aspects which I think Rich regarded as “treasures”.
Rich also uses descriptive language,
metaphors and imagery which help convey this point as well. In one such case
she writes, “...the ribs of the disaster curving their assertion among the
tentative haunters,” (Rich 1387) illustrating the perception of change in
society. Here the disaster is the threat to family life in feminist movements
and ideas, and in feminists themselves, as they tried to make light of the
inequalities in society between men and women, and empower women at the same
time. Rich also frequently mentions a “book
of myths” which could be seen to represent/stand for the assumptions and ideas
society constructed of/for women, and feminists. There is also a mention of
ladders, as Rich writes, “The ladder is always there hanging innocently close
to the side of the schooner. We know what it is for, we who have used it.”(Rich,
1386). I took this to stand for women,
particularly feminists, trying to move beyond their place of oppression and
submissiveness in society.
I think this also leads to a point
Rich was trying to make about women’s identity. As Rich wrote, “…we are the
half destroyed instruments that once held to a course” (Rich, 1386). I feel as though, this could have two
interpretations. The first being that women were exhausted in trying to fight
for their cause of equality, and/or that women were left tired in trying to hold
to the course/life society expected them to have. For long ago, and even still today,
women were/are expected to marry, become a mother, and are expected to be in
more submissive roles. This thus leaves women conflicted-are they supposed to
stick to what society wants and expects of them? Is it too harmful to deviate
from the norms of what it means to be a “woman”?
I think this could still relate to
society today; I would almost argue that society is still a bit of a wreck when
it comes to these issues. While we’ve come a long way since the first and second
wave feminist movements, many of these same expectations, assumptions, and ideas
of women exist in society that can certainly be detrimental and contribute to
women being oppressed.